Hi everyone,
It’s been a while, hope everyone is enjoying some peaceful time with their loved ones as we remember those who have given everything so that we can do so.
Many of you have asked what happened in court in March. Essentially, we heard the other side’s argument against the resolution was that they felt the resolution was invalid, as most people signed a signature sheet and not a piece of paper with the resolution and their signature on the same sheet of paper. The defendants’ lawyer accepted that the 27 people who signed via e-signature, but contested the signatures of the 80+ owners who signed on a physical piece of paper.
Rather than waiting five or more years for a jury trial to have folks testify to how they signed, and pay unnecessary legal fees in the duration, it seems simpler to have everyone sign a new resolution. It also has provided time for the defendants to show if they have changed their behavior from what we have seen in the past. What are your thoughts on this?
We look forward to hearing your thoughts and engaging with you to advance our community to a better place.